From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Sep  4 22:29:05 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id WAA01453
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 4 Sep 1995 22:29:05 -0700
Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [192.216.222.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA01429
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 4 Sep 1995 22:28:58 -0700
Received: from mail0.iij.ad.jp (mail0.iij.ad.jp [192.244.176.61])
          by who.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.11) with ESMTP id TAA15879
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 4 Sep 1995 19:59:17 -0700
Received: from uucp0.iij.ad.jp (uucp0.iij.ad.jp [192.244.176.51]) by mail0.iij.ad.jp (8.6.12+2.4W/3.3W9-MAIL) with ESMTP id LAA07555; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 11:55:27 +0900
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by uucp0.iij.ad.jp (8.6.12+2.4W/3.3W9-UUCP) with UUCP id LAA21649; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 11:55:30 +0900
Received: from xxx.fct.kgc.co.jp by fender.fct.kgc.co.jp (8.6.12+2.4W/3.4W:95071117) id LAA11713; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 11:18:14 +0900
Received: by xxx.fct.kgc.co.jp (8.6.11/3.3W8:95062916) id LAA25825; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 11:18:13 +0900
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 1995 11:18:13 +0900
From: Toshihiro Kanda <candy@fct.kgc.co.jp>
Message-Id: <199509050218.LAA25825@xxx.fct.kgc.co.jp>
To: Stephen Hocking <sysseh@devetir.qld.gov.au>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: Stephen Hocking's message of 5 Sep 1995 00:19:17 +0900
Subject: AMD dx4-100 - Any good?
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

  I'd run AMD DX4-100 for 6 months on FreeBSD 1.1.5.1~2.0.  At least
for me, it ran perfectly.  Here's results of dhrystone 2.1 benchmark.
This shows AMD DX4 doesn't run so fast for its clock, because of my
f*ckin' M/B :-<

 64102.6(4-100)
 59405.9(466)
 31380.8(433)

candy@fct.kgc.co.jp (Toshihiro Kanda)

> Has anyone had any experience running the AMD DX4-100 under FreeBSD - are 
> there any gotcha's (like having to disable internal caches or downright 
> incompatibility). What do people know about htis beast - does it have a math 
> copro on board and how does it benchmark compared to an Intel DX2-66?
> 
> 
> 	Stephen
> 
>         I do not speak for the Worker's Compensation Board of Queensland -
>                      They don't pay me enough for that!
>