From owner-freebsd-newbies Mon Oct 30 14: 0:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Received: from heorot.1nova.com (sub24-23.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.24.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D1037B4C5 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:00:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by heorot.1nova.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7EABB326E; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 14:23:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by heorot.1nova.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639C1326D; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 14:23:47 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 14:23:47 +0000 (GMT) From: Rick Hamell To: David Johnson Cc: "'freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG'" Subject: Re: Newbie packages In-Reply-To: <39FDEA7E.3E42BA0A@acuson.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Under each section there should be two entries for each of "beginning", > "intermediate" and "advanced". An individual package can be in more than > one section. Packages should have one or two comments by users, and a > description. Links to additional information are encouraged. Ratings on > the order of "ease of use", "raw power", "geek factor", etc. are a > possibility. I don't want any overall ratings. At this point this almost sounds like it'd be easier to add to each port's description.... If the user is going to have to to through the trouble of reading each of these that'd be easier. I still think as "suggested" list is the better track, heck even both would be a good idea. Rick ******************************************************************* Rick's FreeBSD Web page http://heorot.1nova.com/freebsd Ace Logan's Hardware Guide http://www.shatteredcrystal.net/hardware ***FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-newbies" in the body of the message