From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 28 19:07:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D9E1065678 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:07:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh1.interactivevillages.com (ca.2e.7bae.static.theplanet.com [174.123.46.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A208FC1E for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-24-22-230-24.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([24.22.230.24] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh1.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QFWZ1-0002GD-3Q for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:07:48 -0400 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:07:45 -0700 Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:07:45 -0700 From: Chip Camden To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110428190745.GE77343@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4DB7B237.7000603@marino.st> <20110427075436.70ae18ac@seibercom.net> <4DB96EC9.8000506@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fWddYNRDgTk9wQGZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DB96EC9.8000506@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh1.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: How are [MAINTAINER] patches handled and why aren't PRs FIFO? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:07:50 -0000 --fWddYNRDgTk9wQGZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Correct me if I'm wrong, but as I understand it committers have commit privilege for all ports. What if certain qualified port maintainers who aren't committers were nevertheless given commit access for only the leaf ports that they maintain? Wouldn't that speed up the overall process? --=20 =2EO. | Sterling (Chip) Camden | http://camdensoftware.com =2E.O | sterling@camdensoftware.com | http://chipsquips.com OOO | 2048R/D6DBAF91 | http://chipstips.com --fWddYNRDgTk9wQGZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNubsBAAoJEIpckszW26+RmeoH/imGlQmeoMoWvO3077WsJDH+ +aWj/KQ41twPX9N3OWdYlUko+5Vy9S19k8Up4lKA8//LPImD6W4bZCfgeeLajU0x lCrDwr2Yr0IcmpApKykZ6bC9Cili6Y2TrqwttpAGO+CRPTUwspE1NpdRQGzaSgYy RFTJDLPt7lP0o+pZ6AiiRcRpxPkg76vW+kOyxjAxGy//pTjsUUgkdM36HoK01qRd CpJJqQevFnKnlmBajtRgMEu26oDxYNTvwdcd01fusmnrXbyy22u5F2hypfnjKc7q RDxVn9JY6R/14dc0dk9bt0nak1oYnKgBxIFYI+56kIyKPh5jwkUdoThnV1L7Bts= =hin3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fWddYNRDgTk9wQGZ--