From owner-cvs-sys  Thu Oct  3 01:22:26 1996
Return-Path: owner-cvs-sys
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA12572
          for cvs-sys-outgoing; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 01:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (root@spinner.DIALix.COM [192.203.228.67])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA12550;
          Thu, 3 Oct 1996 01:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (peter@localhost.DIALix.oz.au [127.0.0.1])
          by spinner.DIALix.COM (8.8.0/8.8.0) with ESMTP id QAA04002;
          Thu, 3 Oct 1996 16:21:27 +0800 (WST)
Message-Id: <199610030821.QAA04002@spinner.DIALix.COM>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
cc: sos@FreeBSD.org, jkh@freefall.freebsd.org,
        CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org,
        cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/isa syscons.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 03 Oct 1996 10:11:54 +0200."
             <5306.844330314@critter.tfs.com> 
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 1996 16:21:27 +0800
From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.DIALix.COM>
Sender: owner-cvs-sys@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >> That should be enough to shut up gcc.  Althought what to do about the
> >> SYSCTL macro for declaring functions where you don't get the chance to
> >> do this, I'm not sure about.
> 
> Stick the __unused gunk in the SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS macro in /sys/sys/sysctl.h

Heh, silly me.  I assumed that gcc would bitch if we used a variable that
was explicitly declared unused...  It seems not...

Cheers,
-Peter