Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 Jan 2001 16:56:13 +0200
From:      Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>
To:        Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@inpharmatica.co.uk>
Cc:        Bill Fumerola <billf@mu.org>, Chris BeHanna <behanna@zbzoom.net>, FreeBSD-Stable <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Roadmap for perl upgrades to STABLE?
Message-ID:  <20010104165613.A91031@mithrandr.moria.org>
In-Reply-To: <3A547E37.846A303F@inpharmatica.co.uk>; from m.seaman@inpharmatica.co.uk on Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:44:23PM %2B0000
References:  <200012260828.eBQ8SFF09546@gratis.grondar.za> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012270006380.2693-100000@browning.pennasoft.com> <20001226231547.R72273@elvis.mu.org> <3A547E37.846A303F@inpharmatica.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu 2001-01-04 (13:44), Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Bill Fumerola wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 12:08:53AM -0500, Chris BeHanna wrote:
> > 
> > >     Not that I'm a fan of the GPL, but wouldn't importation of gmake
> > > into the toolchain that gets installed by default help this problem
> > > along enormously?
> > 
> > What can it do that bmake can't?
> > 
> 
> Automatically generate dependencies and then apply them as part of a higher
> level target all in the same `make' invocation? ie. `make depend' can be a
> sub-target of `make all'.  That's about the only feature of gmake I've ever
> used and missed having in BSD make.  

all: .depend ?

(that is to say, that's what it sounds like, I'm probably not parsing
what you mean properly.)

Neil
-- 
Neil Blakey-Milner
nbm@mithrandr.moria.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010104165613.A91031>