From owner-freebsd-current Thu Oct 29 04:56:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA20155 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 29 Oct 1998 04:56:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from SIMULTAN.CH (eunet-gw.simultan.ch [194.191.191.82] (may be forged)) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA20149 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 1998 04:56:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tseidmann@simultan.ch) Received: from simultan.ch (wsaltis-053.SIMULTAN.CH [192.92.128.53]) by SIMULTAN.CH (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA26796; Thu, 29 Oct 1998 13:54:20 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <36386575.35E337FC@simultan.ch> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 13:54:13 +0100 From: Thomas Seidmann X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Hay CC: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPv6 in -current References: <199810291238.OAA21028@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Hay wrote: > (and using) the KAME stuff the last few weeks and am quite impressed > with it. One of the advantages (for me) about the KAME stack is that we > also get their IPSEC stuff, while with INRIA being in France, it makes > things a little more complicated. It does mean that we will probably > have to decide beforehand how we will deal with the crypto code. Maybe > somehow seperate it and make it available from internat.freebas.org for > the nonUSA people, like the rest of the FreeBSD crypto code? INRIA's IPSEC code is IMHO a no-brainer. In the last distribution, complete AH has been added, since this can be exported from France. The ESP stuff cannot be, however, but it take only to copy 4-5 files with the missing code and adding a couple of options in the kernel config file (I do have these files, ehce theyt could be stored for instance at internat.freebas.org). > I know the last IPv6 discussion ended with the idea that the different > IPv6 groups should "get together" and figure out what should go into > FreeBSD and where it should go into FreeBSD, but I'm not sure that > anything happened after that? Or was it just behind the scenes? I'm intereseted in this, too. > John > -- > John Hay -- John.Hay@mikom.csir.co.za Regards, Thomas -- ========================================================== Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Seidmann Senior IT systems architect Simultan AG, CH-6246 Altishofen, Switzerland mailto:tseidmann@simultan.ch tel +41.62.7489000 http://www.simultan.ch/~thomas fax +41.62.7489010 ========================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message