From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Mar 11 9:20:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from fb00.eng00.mindspring.net (fb00.eng00.mindspring.net [207.69.200.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40A137BCA2 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 09:20:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhix@mindspring.com) Received: from jhix.mindspring.com (user-33qtjd2.dialup.mindspring.com [199.174.205.162]) by fb00.eng00.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA14058; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 12:20:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (jhix@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jhix.mindspring.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id JAA07397; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 09:24:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhix@mindspring.com) To: kmg@bestweb.net Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD dead? In-Reply-To: <00031017434102.00380@kevin.bestweb.net> References: <00031017434102.00380@kevin.bestweb.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on XEmacs 21.1 (Bryce Canyon) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20000311092423U.jhix@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 09:24:23 -0800 From: W Gerald Hicks X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130) Lines: 14 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG From: Kevin M Geraci > Maybe FreeBSD needs to "spin off" like Slackware is > doing and let Walnut Creek merge. I don't see why that thought even crossed your mind. Anyone could "spinoff" FreeBSD anytime they wanted to. So far, there has been no compelling reason to do so and it's hard to believe a splinter faction would add any value over the course that's been laid. -- Jerry Hicks jhix@mindspring.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message