Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 6 Oct 2006 09:57:38 +0200
From:      Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
To:        Jerry Bell <jbell@stelesys.com>
Cc:        freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Help with improving mysql performance on 6.2PRE
Message-ID:  <20061006075738.GA64854@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
In-Reply-To: <3731.71.56.92.181.1160009571.squirrel@www.stelesys.com>
References:  <3731.71.56.92.181.1160009571.squirrel@www.stelesys.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 08:52:51PM -0400, Jerry Bell wrote:
> I have a Dell PE2950 with 2 dual core 3.73Ghz processors and 4G of ram. 
> I've looked through some of the lists here and have seen super-smack
> results in the 42k qps range on a 2 dual core opteron system.  I'm able to
> get up to about 34k with the wide at the back of my server whilest rubbing
> the side of it.
> 
> Here's what I've done:
> built both mysql 5.0 and 5.1 from ports with build_static and
> optimazations on.
> changed the clock to TSC
> 
> added the following to my /etc/libmap.conf file:
> [mysqld]
> libc_r.so.5             libthr.so.2
> libc_r.so.6             libthr.so.2
> libthr.so.2             libthr.so.2
> libpthread.so.1         libthr.so.2
> libpthread.so.2         libthr.so.2
> 
> And this is about the best result I get:
> 2950# super-smack -d mysql select-key-mysql.smack 10 10000
> Query Barrel Report for client smacker1
> connect: max=200ms  min=0ms avg= 20ms from 10 clients
> Query_type      num_queries     max_time        min_time        q_per_s
> select_index    200000  0       0       34440.88
> 
> 
> Are there any other optimizations I need to do to mysql or freebsd?  I'm
> still not 100% convinced that I've done everything I need to use libthr
> instead of libpthread.

on UP people recomend to use TSC instead of acpi timer



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061006075738.GA64854>