Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 5 May 2000 12:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
To:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: bin/18312: FreeBSD System Recovery -- mt not statically  linked
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.10005051223400.15583-100000@semuta.feral.com>
In-Reply-To: <200005051816.LAA80655@apollo.backplane.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> :
> :Can anyone think of a reason to *not* have mt statically linked?
> :
> :-matt
> 
>     There's not much point statically linking mt if it's sitting in
>     /usr/bin.  On the face of it it does seem a good candidate to move
>     to /bin.

Well, yes, that's what would come with this as well.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10005051223400.15583-100000>