From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 1 21:49:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AAD516A417 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 21:49:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from postman.atlantis.dp.ua (postman.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.47.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5233C43CAF for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 21:49:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231]) by postman.atlantis.dp.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kB1Lnpvv076991; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 23:49:51 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 23:49:51 +0200 (EET) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: Chuck Swiger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20061201232848.I53143@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> References: <4563126E.2060904@math.missouri.edu> <20061129143330.T82233@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20061130205045.A96066@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <3BC50132-2DD9-4FAA-8320-C945DF4BFD48@mac.com> <20061201120708.D81433@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Subject: Re: sshd. "UseDNS no" ignored? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:49:57 -0000 Hello! On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Chuck Swiger wrote: >> And I didn't say that it's the OSI Open Source. I wrote "(which is also >> open-source)", not even "Open Source". So I didn't mean that you can just >> copy&paste their sources into OpenSSH. [ ... ] > I'd really prefer that people not claim a license is "open source" without > submitting their license for consideration to the OSI board via the > mailing list, and having it be approved. Just 2 points: 1) I _didn't_ "claim a license is "open source"". My point is that all sources of the product are open to your eyes. No more, but no less. 2) We _aren't_ in @opensource.org mailing list hierarchy - it's FreeBSD maillist, and I hope I'm free to _not_ submit anything to opensource.org's consideration, and just to express my opinion instead. P.S. I apologise for off-topic traffic generation here, but I didn't start this license-centric bullshit. > -Chuck Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE