From owner-freebsd-net Wed May 5 11:19:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BE591538F for ; Wed, 5 May 1999 11:19:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id RAA29264; Wed, 5 May 1999 17:34:48 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199905051534.RAA29264@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: ipfw and tulip To: alk@pobox.com Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 17:34:48 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <14128.33126.285857.312148@avalon.east> from "Anthony Kimball" at May 5, 99 12:37:57 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 975 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I observe that using ipfw 'pipe' delays with a tulip card terminates > the kernel. Are there specific 100bTX cards with which this is known > to work reliably? we need more info on the os release you are using. There were some glitches in dummynet, which may or may not affect you depending on whether you use BRIDGE, -current, and multiple routes out of your net. RELENG_3 and RELENG_2_2 were in better shape. I think i fixed all known (to me) problems with yesterday's round of commits. cheers luigi -----------------------------------+------------------------------------- Luigi RIZZO, luigi@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa TEL/FAX: +39-050-568.533/522 . via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 PISA (Italy) http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ngc99/ ==== First International Workshop on Networked Group Communication ==== -----------------------------------+------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message