From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 30 09:42:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6A116A417 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:42:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from nat-application.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz (nat-application.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz [195.122.204.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5851513C4EA for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:42:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pav.hide.vol.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nat-application.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0U9N8WG070401; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:23:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from pav@localhost) by pav.hide.vol.cz (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m0U9N74J070400; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:23:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: pav.hide.vol.cz: pav set sender to pav@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Pav Lucistnik To: d@delphij.net In-Reply-To: <47A02444.7060706@delphij.net> References: <47A02444.7060706@delphij.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-dHXM7jE5+uUACWE2MEyn" Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:23:07 +0100 Message-Id: <1201684987.69890.27.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: -x11@ maintainship? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:42:45 -0000 --=-dHXM7jE5+uUACWE2MEyn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xin LI p=ED=B9e v =FAt 29. 01. 2008 v 23:16 -0800: > I'd like to know about our current policy on -x11@ maintained ports. > E.g. is it enforced like other MAINTAINERS=3D lines? N.B. I have a patc= h > for xf86-video-nv at > http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/for_review/xf86-video-nv.diff , where > should I seek for approval? I think flz expressed several times in the past clearly that he's not an X11 overlord and anyone is welcome to help with the ports. --=20 Pav Lucistnik East or west, ~ is best. --=-dHXM7jE5+uUACWE2MEyn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBHoEH7ntdYP8FOsoIRAp6dAKC1mypO2cxgBSLevt9q9Wh9YmG2oACcDS12 zRwNDKRwpj8XISuRUpcVRP8= =442L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-dHXM7jE5+uUACWE2MEyn--