From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 17 09:01:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D64106566B for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:01:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mk@mkdev.eu) Received: from natrium.sulf.at (natrium.sulf.at [88.198.116.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34428FC20 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:01:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mk@mkdev.eu) Received: from [192.168.101.179] (dslb-084-057-026-112.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.57.26.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by natrium.sulf.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43168114B7 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <48070E93.9030705@mkdev.eu> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:47:15 +0200 From: Markus Klaschka Organization: mkdev.eu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; de-DE; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20080208 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org References: <5873E91C-C096-4EE1-A5F5-4BCE110E2EE7@ish.com.au> <15A6FBF6-052E-486D-9470-CAE5819BE93F@ish.com.au> <20080416095945.GA91566@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20080416095945.GA91566@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000408040305000101090504" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: NFS performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:01:46 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000408040305000101090504 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit That's interesting cause heavy reading from NFS brought me a loadavg of 70 and more if there were a lot of small files to read. I thought this is a normal issue about NFS... By the way, are all Realtek Cards for the bin or only the 8139...the server has a 'RTL8169 Gigabit Ethernet Adapter' I mean, you all know this, if not read the comments in that file ;) root@kalium:~ > grep worst /usr/src/sys/pci/if_rl.c * probably the worst PCI ethernet controller ever made, with the possible What could be configured wrong? What's the best way to test bandwidth if I only got one well connected server? pathchar? Cheers Markus Kris Kennaway schrieb: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:02:33AM +1000, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > >> On 15/04/2008, at 10:54 PM, gnn@freebsd.org wrote: >> >>> I am working with the Chelsio hardware and it seems to be well >>> supported on FreeBSD. All the machines in that system are FreeBSD >>> though. How do you intend to get the OSX systems to be 10GE? >>> >> What sort of throughput are you getting with that setup? Are you using >> NFS between the systems? >> > > I get about 150 MB/sec NFS random write throughput between chelsio > NICs. We are still in the process of optimizing NFS at the high end. > For bulk packet throughput it is not difficult to saturate it. > > Kris > > -- > In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. > -- Charles Forsythe > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Markus Klaschka MKDev - Markus Klaschka Development http://www.mkdev.eu Spain: 0034 - 63 747 23 07 UK: 0044 - 750 910 2718 Mail: mk@mkdev.eu Skype: mark-use IRC: mark-use @ irc.freenode.net : #freebsd, ##security, #freebsd-src, #bsdforen.de, #bsdgroup.de --------------000408040305000101090504--