From owner-freebsd-current Fri Mar 16 4:40:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B67C37B719; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 04:40:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f2GCdAa92070; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:39:10 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru) Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:39:10 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai Cc: Eugene Polovnikov , net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nos-tun & multihomed machines Message-ID: <20010316143910.B90057@sunbay.com> Mail-Followup-To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai , Eugene Polovnikov , net@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20010316112914.A50671@zssm.zp.ua> <20010316105026.A12010@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <20010316124046.D67000@sunbay.com> <20010316125806.J12010@daemon.ninth-circle.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010316125806.J12010@daemon.ninth-circle.org>; from asmodai@wxs.nl on Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 12:58:06PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [-current dropped (Bcc'ed)] On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 12:58:06PM +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > -On [20010316 12:45], Ruslan Ermilov (ru@FreeBSD.ORG) wrote: > >On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:50:26AM +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > >> -On [20010316 10:43], Eugene Polovnikov (paranoid@brain-fag.org) wrote: > > [gif versus nos-tun] > > >Yes, gif(4) works the same way, and multihomed enabled (see gifconfig(8)), > >with the exception that it always uses the IPPROTO_IPV4 (protocol 4) for > >encapsulating of IPv4 payload. > > [gif preferred over nos-tun] > > >I fully agree. > > Noted. > > >> Translated, does gif do what nos-tun can do and more? Yes? Let's rip > >> out nos-tun and support the other well maintained solution. > >> > >Except that it does not allow to use proto 94 (the default for nos-tun). > > I'm sure we can work something out with the KAME guys over this, if it > is necessary to keep this in. *chalks up another task* > It should be pretty easy to add the ``int gif_pproto'' member to the gif_softc structure, and expand gif_ioctl() interface to handle smth like SIOC[SG]IFPPROTO (where PPROTO stands for "physical protocol"). Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message