From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jul 11 15:53:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6AAB92899 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:53:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78ED914EE; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:53:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id f126so96104027wma.1; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:53:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Lq15CWxIePAVpnCE/fYy2ghMYJXsTnoacKX8eO2TdBo=; b=dEtG/vtrTx5b9xetbhRElL9DydcdX5H8HBmDwcK7hhwrRxb1rKxXCU3G4T+XfBa+3b S4Rmix0YZ/JqK+40uhl+tRsfDKGNg6JqYPGrT0X1BovyYe5NgawDbAmNSS4i2Pea3NIv uQNVN8wwwPDyzyEZV/7SCTo9wqsjX6etZZGqSY1xPiypAkdjgucKwAi/2GNaPld46D/v re6bVAWFBuVxzc7yCSKVGXr5duwOwaF61ineSJouExFI+5r1aSuMHYJ3khbnhtiQ6XAK a5pe1IUjxiC4dZp0Cz18wPrUkYFkvAKPTi6sscTfNjEE6OaeOcp5FjIE8E3EIq2H8OV2 hKCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Lq15CWxIePAVpnCE/fYy2ghMYJXsTnoacKX8eO2TdBo=; b=cTLZwhVhKcuVOz7o1xvLl7D/DSRjnqnHY3BQ1PgM/wWfSuvmKH3L+UP8CFYRXfPd48 0OoBZX5GKKhHkUikE0+a4ktBITMaCbQMF1Ol3mT6tNyrB5Fa7sdfffkf2Jwmrnc5bVEc 79f2WUzy9M/CgI8U86SfKdkuVOS9vGlFeqrHKea6x5hD96SL7vfeJ84CNnE5zJ5at1rj 37dxQMI+0H53Ujw3bkxCVUWmioP4JEVKz3kP60SH6CbCrf3yeH1Q4wirZkav00q3oKMl 7G+i6nKUc45QT1ZDigz93hwCyATsmMJ06o6h7ViozgcowmvLWeUwVWxEAbHnH6eH1p7o Q83A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJU4k2ucJyQUv4u7B/DkoN1zkD/Vi8zBIqXuaMQszc5ZOzLpq/UHveeShTygyWRwFmu6NumenNjysmWrg== X-Received: by 10.28.30.23 with SMTP id e23mr16098216wme.66.1468252398690; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:53:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.63.9 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:53:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Pavel Timofeev Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:53:18 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] change in default openssl coming To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: ports-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:53:20 -0000 2016-07-08 9:26 GMT+03:00 Mathieu Arnold : > Hi, > > During this summer (sometime in August I think) I will be changing the > default OpenSSL for the ports tree from the base system version to > security/openssl. > > I will also, because it goes with it, change the default GSSAPI from base > to something else, I think the consensus was to use the MIT version, which > is security/krb5. > > Before I do that, it would be nice if people who actually use Kerberos (so, > that's the two of you at the back) could provide some feedback if it > changing this will break things. > > -- > Mathieu Arnold Hi! I'm sorry, if this questions already was answered: Does making base openssl private for base system components mean it will include only headers/libs (in future?)? I mean no binaries or any kind of other resources like examples/docs? I think keeping them in base will be a bit weird in such case. Also if base openssl becomes private do we need Kerberos in base?