From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 20:47:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F2F16A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 20:47:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4905C43D39 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 20:47:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.21] (rat.samsco.home [192.168.254.21]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j36KoEmm046960; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:50:14 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <42544A76.3090803@samsco.org> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:45:42 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050321 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Bogan References: <0c2a01c53abd$d9556750$8adb7bd1@icarz.com> <42540961.4030204@samsco.org> <68fafae2bf1ebfdbaa8547720700d6fd@segpub.com.au> In-Reply-To: <68fafae2bf1ebfdbaa8547720700d6fd@segpub.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.11-STABLE/PAE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 20:47:43 -0000 Jeremy Bogan wrote: >> The lack of PAE support for aac in 4.11 is unfortunately correct. It >> would probably take 1-2 days to backport it, but it hasn't been a >> high priority so far. > > > Thanks for the info. I'm actually swapping out the PERC/3 card with a > PERC/4 since it doesn't use the aac driver, and I can't see any issues > with the amr driver supporting more than 4GB memory. > Uh, no, the amr driver in 4.x doesn't support >4GB either. Well, it kind of will, but it will die under load. Scott