From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 9 03:29:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C8016A4CE for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 03:29:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264A443D49 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 03:29:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3602B6370; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 22:29:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93682-10; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 22:29:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [198.92.228.34] (racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F176348; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 22:29:18 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <413FCE0D.9010206@makeworld.com> Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 22:29:17 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040903) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garance A Drosihn References: <20040906143153.N44103@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20040906125305.7f577034@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <413CA557.5090205@makeworld.com> <200409070649.11417.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <413E4849.7060200@kutulu.org> <6.1.2.0.2.20040909092123.023f79f0@mail.nerdshack.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Rob B Subject: Re: portsdb and ruby bug on 4-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 03:29:23 -0000 Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 9:22 AM +1000 9/9/04, Rob B wrote: > >>> This way, all of the package tools will always see the replacement >>> driver, regardless of the state of the environment when you run >>> them :) >> >> >> For the record - Alpha arch does not exhibit this problem. This >> is on both 5.3-BETA and 4.10-STABLE > > > It is almost certainly a matter of luck. With some INDEX's, > i386 will see the problem and alpha won't. On other INDEX's, > you'll be the one having trouble and no one on i386 will see > the problem. It's not like the bugs magically disappear on > alpha. They just show up in different situations. > It's pretty simple everyone - there IS an issue. One only needs to search both here, and the Questions list. There is more then one way around this. One way that seems to be missed is using portindex/portindexdb. I think presenting as many "fixes" as possible gives the end user the choice that he/she is more "comfy" doing. Is there a "more correct" way over the others? I don't know. That's something the maintainers ought to come up with. Let's not avoid other possible answer for the simple fact of "well, I'll have to install additional software". We'll come up with ways, let's let the coders decide the "best practice". -- Best regards, Chris Working capital doesn't.