From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 6 15:20:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6EB641A; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 15:20:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from secure.freebsdsolutions.net (secure.freebsdsolutions.net [69.55.234.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 957D41180; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 15:20:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.46] (c-50-160-123-105.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [50.160.123.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by secure.freebsdsolutions.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s16FKIJF076978 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 6 Feb 2014 10:20:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: IPFW fwd not working after upgrade from 9.2 to 10.0 From: John Nielsen In-Reply-To: <52F368FC.5010200@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 08:20:14 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <8C9CDEF4-A44A-4207-BB87-DA3E7CF89917@jnielsen.net> <52F34871.4030204@yandex.ru> <52F368FC.5010200@FreeBSD.org> To: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Stable" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) X-DCC--Metrics: ns1.jnielsen.net 1102; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 15:20:26 -0000 On Feb 6, 2014, at 3:50 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > On 06.02.2014 12:31, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: >> On 06.02.2014 04:08, John Nielsen wrote: >>> I have been using IPFW FWD to do per-interface routing on a VM >>> instance. The default gateway is on interface vtnet0, but there is a >>> second interface, vtnet1, on a different network with its own public >>> IP address. The second network has its own gateway, which I'd like = to >>> use for responses to connections coming on on vtnet1. Under 9.2, the >>> below worked fine: >>=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> you can apply this patch: >> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D260702 >=20 > JFYI, I merged the fix from head/. You can update your system to > 10-STABLE and it should work. Thank you Andrey and Ronald. I should have looked at both the errata and = the commit logs sooner. I'll patch my kernel. JN