From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 3 22:42:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CAD37B401; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:42:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-150.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E867C43F85; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:42:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F4066E3A; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:42:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9403E12A5; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:42:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:42:42 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Bigbrother Message-ID: <20030404064242.GA18876@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030404040923.6911A37B40B@hub.freebsd.org> <001d01c2fa74$5508ddf0$e203a8c0@macedon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001d01c2fa74$5508ddf0$e203a8c0@macedon> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Diskcheckd Port and Freebsd 4.7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 06:42:43 -0000 --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 09:35:01AM +0300, Bigbrother wrote: > My question is why it says that it isn't tested on anything less than > 5.0, even though I had compiled and used it on 4.X fbsds in the past? It says it wasn't tested because it wasn't tested :-) > P.s. I tried to fiddle with the makefile removing the IGNORE line but > the compilation failed in a lot of places... Sounds like a good reason for it to be marked IGNORE then. Kris --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+jSliWry0BWjoQKURAiEHAJ0TWb20mQlu188ir72xRNx+6Ff7qACfXckn hFsDZfLU0JvQPg8H0wKk1uU= =xmjz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn--