Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 23:23:21 -0600 From: Benjamin Kaduk <bjk@freebsd.org> To: Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.com> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, NetBSD Users <netbsd-users@NetBSD.org> Subject: Re: Improved manual page for ul(1) Message-ID: <20161109052321.GA91607@kduck.kaduk.org> In-Reply-To: <ef226887-41c6-f803-e2c1-ee7f7c274c1f@NTLWorld.com> References: <c576068d-3aac-596c-ae7b-d3c855e2a88b@NTLWorld.com> <20161106190144.GL91607@kduck.kaduk.org> <87e90ef8-05d2-1480-47ce-cc228fb3fd36@NTLWorld.com> <ef226887-41c6-f803-e2c1-ee7f7c274c1f@NTLWorld.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 09:17:53AM +0000, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote: > Jonathan de Boyne Pollard: > > > And more interesting is whether less could be fixed to make groff's > > overstrikes work. Or groff fixed to not need overstrikes for things > > that can be done in Unicode ... > > > It turns out that this is the man command limiting things. Again. It's > hardwiring -Tascii even if it detects a UTF-8 character locale. Note that the affected codepath is only for the legacy groff fallback; the common case should be using mandoc(1) directly (though I would not be surprised if it still needs patching to pass -Tmumble). -Ben
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20161109052321.GA91607>