From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Dec 3 18:05:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA03738 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 18:05:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA03730 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 18:05:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA02287; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 18:07:09 -0800 (PST) To: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh cc: "Open Systems Inc." , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Eivind Eklund Subject: Re: Can we just come to a decision on IPv6 and IPSec? In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 04 Dec 1998 10:50:48 +0900." <27221.912736248@coconut.itojun.org> Date: Thu, 03 Dec 1998 18:07:08 -0800 Message-ID: <2283.912737228@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Anyway, even if the project ends, I certainly will maintain KAME tree > (KAME was maintained in my home last year) and I'm a FreeBSD committer. OK, well, here's the $10,000 question (as we say in the U.S.): Assuming that a decision was made to just go with the KAME code (and I'm not implying that it has been), how soon could this code enter -current and how soon, in your opinion, would it be before it was integrated well enough to be fully functional? I'm thinking this might be a perfect post-branch activity (IPv6 would be a 3.1 feature) which means that any time after mid-January would be a good time. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message