From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 21 20:24:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE071065672 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:24:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward10.mail.yandex.net (forward10.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:202::5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716F88FC12 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp6.mail.yandex.net (smtp6.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.56]) by forward10.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id C971C1022A94; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:24:02 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1329855842; bh=hr30E5AVHy40EQa0R81ewRfiO2Cx6vjbRITvMwx+3aY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ne3DOCTus3a9VRV1GN3VA1EJ38ngKIHRj2Seqr7RInZqX0tcD0/oxYcirNOr/6JSm a+DFnTqxNlmSBcdWaqCf1qbbe8cnpf9Ms+SibvJfI1o4huqZKCNsoX8tVTD6/xss8j hxcoHaWcwbTAXz8ymKK/y7FGrapTmSrJzXVfk4x8= Received: from smtp6.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id A2B6416403CF; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:24:02 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1329855842; bh=hr30E5AVHy40EQa0R81ewRfiO2Cx6vjbRITvMwx+3aY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ne3DOCTus3a9VRV1GN3VA1EJ38ngKIHRj2Seqr7RInZqX0tcD0/oxYcirNOr/6JSm a+DFnTqxNlmSBcdWaqCf1qbbe8cnpf9Ms+SibvJfI1o4huqZKCNsoX8tVTD6/xss8j hxcoHaWcwbTAXz8ymKK/y7FGrapTmSrJzXVfk4x8= Received: from unknown (unknown [77.93.52.20]) by smtp6.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id O2I4oHPH-O2IqlwoX; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:24:02 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:24:00 +0200 From: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: =?windows-1251?B?188gyu7t/Oru4iwgRnJlZUxpbmU=?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1449343157.20120221222400@yandex.ru> To: Matthew Seaman In-Reply-To: <4F4389BD.6040205@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <376001325.20120220220651@yandex.ru> <4F4389BD.6040205@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:24:05 -0000 Здравствуйте, Matthew. Вы писали 21 февраля 2012 г., 14:10:37: MS> On 20/02/2012 20:06, Коньков Евгений wrote: >> >> vlan74: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 >> options=3 >> ether f4:6d:04:7c:7b:d3 >> inet6 fe80::f66d:4ff:fe7c:7bd3%vlan74 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd >> inet 10.1.26.1 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 10.1.27.255 >> inet 10.1.26.3 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 10.1.27.255 >> nd6 options=29 >> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) >> status: active >> vlan: 74 parent interface: re0 >> >> ifconfig vlan74 delete 10.1.26.1 >> >> will delete these static routes from route table: >> >> 10.3.0.1 10.7.26.2 UGHS 8 367 vlan74 >> 10.1.6.0/23 10.7.26.2 UGS 275 166969 vlan74 10.3.0.1 10.1.26.2 UGHS 8 367 vlan74 10.1.6.0/23 10.1.26.2 UGS 275 166969 vlan74 I had mistake. >> >> Does this a bug? MS> Hmmm... how have you managed to have a next hop address of 10.7.26.2 on MS> your vlan74 interface, when the local network appears to be 10.1.26.0/23 MS> ? What's the route to 10.7.26.2 -- presumably this is also accessible MS> on vlan74 ? MS> It certainly seems odd that your routes have disappeared, but I'm MS> wondering if they were culled from the routing table because the system MS> thought they weren't logically connected to the local system? Given MS> that they have seen traffic, perhaps this was connected to a different MS> change that the deletion of 10.1.26.1 that you highlighted? -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru