Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:21:49 +0000
From:      Prafulla Deuskar <pdeuskar@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
Message-ID:  <20060804162149.GB22299@hub.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060804151422.GE96644@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200608031905.k73J55D2061870@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060804095414.GU96644@FreeBSD.org> <20060804143825.GA8797@hub.freebsd.org> <20060804151422.GE96644@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gleb Smirnoff [glebius@FreeBSD.org] wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:38:25PM +0000, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
> P> > P>   Revert back changes to made in rev 1.109 of if_em.c which were unnecessary.
> P> > P>   This makes it easier for us to get the changes into -current and to -stable quickly.
> P> > 
> P> > Can you please confirm that this was a mechanical substitution like this:
> P> > 
> P> > s/sc/adapter/g
> P> > s/em_softc/adapter/g
> P> > 
> P> > and no more additional changes? If this is true, then I hope that we
> P> > (FreeBSD and Intel) have finally came to a common codebase. This is good. :)
> P> > I can stand the long unusual name for driver softc with no problems.
> P> 
> P> Yes - it was a mechanical substitution.
> P> And thanks for taking care of 6.0.5 release.
> 
> Thanks. Any objections about merging the HEAD to RELENG_6 soon?

Jack Vogel is doing the merge - I will send it out to you for review.
So let us plan on committing early next week?

Is there a report on what coverty found with if_em_hw.c?

Thanks,
Prafulla




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060804162149.GB22299>