From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 11 19:19:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from newman2.bestweb.net (newman2.bestweb.net [209.94.102.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1B437B4BB; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 18:17:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from okeeffe.bestweb.net (okeefe.bestweb.net [209.94.100.110]) by newman2.bestweb.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C7823188; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:17:12 -0500 (EST) Received: by okeeffe.bestweb.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id D48B29F2FD; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:12:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 19:16:04 -0800 From: Terry Lambert To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: Joe Kelsey , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc3.x issues Message-Id: <20020212021209.D48B29F2FD@okeeffe.bestweb.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:47:07PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote: > > What is so hard about allowing someone to specify the list of frontends > > to provide at system build time? I thought that gcc was supposed to be > > a modular compiler system, You thought wrong. 8-). > > and that all we are asking for is the ability > > to add to the default front ends, along with the default support > > libraries, in the default places. > > Uh Joe... WhereTF is your patch to do this? > My or your MTA seems to have deleted it. 8-) 8-) 8-). Actually, you could do the Makefile hacks pretty easily, if there were an unconfig'ed full source code in the tree to work from... not that I'm volunteering... if Joe wants help doing that, I can help him out on structure. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message