From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 07:56:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A4316A4CE for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 07:56:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809A843D41 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 07:56:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EC34D51255; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 23:56:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 23:56:08 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Michael C. Shultz" Message-ID: <20041224075608.GA20653@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041223214205.H17211@fez.hyperreal.org> <20041224055954.GA88304@xor.obsecurity.org> <200412232224.05536.ringworm@inbox.lv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200412232224.05536.ringworm@inbox.lv> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsdb and portupgrade causes errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 07:56:09 -0000 --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 10:24:05PM -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > On Thursday 23 December 2004 09:59 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 09:42:37PM -0800, Brian Behlendorf wrote: > > > >run make fetchindex not make fetch index from /usr/ports > > > > > > Out of curiosity, why isn't the index included in the update > > > normally? > > > > It changes dozens of times per day, and the deltas would be enormous. > > > > Kris >=20 > Way back when, I used to get the INDEX when running cvsup unless > I put it in the refuse file. Of coarse it was old and useless so one was= =20 > better off building their own INDEX. So why cant we just receive the=20 > INDEX like we used to, but unlike before, l have it updated as often as= =20 > is being done now? ^=20 EPARSE Kris --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBy8uYWry0BWjoQKURApnOAJ9k7XTI+V+tHkkEwM/ruSgYnGtT4wCdE2C4 14QFauqA2ZcZHZzU2Oc7SEQ= =7U4l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2--