From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 06:31:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AFC016A4CE for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 06:31:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from srvdmz13.oekb.co.at (srvdmz13.oekb.co.at [143.245.5.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A4243D1F for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 06:31:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Ewald.Jenisch@oekb.at) Received: from Unknown [143.245.2.191] by srvdmz13.oekb.co.at - SurfControl E-mail Filter (4.7); Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:31:22 +0100 Received: from athena.oekb.co.at ([143.245.83.20]) by MAIL01.oekb.co.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:31:21 +0100 Received: from athena.oekb.co.at (athena.oekb.co.at [127.0.0.1]) by athena.oekb.co.at (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1BEVKvl031367 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:31:20 +0100 Received: (from ej@localhost) by athena.oekb.co.at (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i1BEVKj3031366 for freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:31:20 +0100 Message-ID: <20040211143120.GB31195@athena.oekb.co.at> From: a@jenisch.at To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:31:20 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Feb 2004 14:31:21.0320 (UTC) FILETIME=[B7FA1680:01C3F0AB] User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Compile errors in gtk20, gstreamer (FreeBSD 5.2) X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:31:24 -0000 Hi, After doing a full portupgrade (portupgrade -arR) on my FreeBSD 5.2 box I ended up with X-win not working. In detail I did the following: cvup-ed the ports-tree as of today pkgdb -F portsdb -Uu portupgrade -arR Futher investigation reveled that during the portupgrade various gnome-related things didn't compile; they failed compilation with errors like this: ------------------------------ < Cut here > ------------------------------ . . . rebuilding global_registry added plugin lavenc with 1 feature(s) added plugin xvideosink with 1 feature(s) added plugin wavparse with 2 feature(s) added plugin wavenc with 1 feature(s) added plugin vumeter with 1 feature(s) Abort trap (core dumped) *** Error code 134 Stop in /usr/ports/multimedia/gstreamer. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/multimedia/gstreamer. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade92070.16 make reinstall egrep: /var/db/pkg/gstreamer-0.6.4/+CONTENTS: No such file or directory ---> Restoring the old version rebuilding global_registry ------------------------------ < Cut here > ------------------------------ likewise gtk-2.0 seems to also fail compilation: /bin/sh ../../mkinstalldirs /usr/X11R6/etc/gtk-2.0 ../../gtk/gtk-query-immodules-2.0 > /usr/X11R6/etc/gtk-2.0/gtk.immodules Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.' at line 83 in file /usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_spinlock.c (errno = 0) Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.' at line 83 in file /usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_spinlock.c (errno = 0) Abort trap (core dumped) *** Error code 134 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20/work/gtk+-2.2.4/modules/input. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20/work/gtk+-2.2.4/modules/input. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20/work/gtk+-2.2.4/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20/work/gtk+-2.2.4. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade92070.2 make reinstall egrep: /var/db/pkg/gtk-2.2.4_1/+CONTENTS: No such file or directory ---> Restoring the old version ------------------------------ < Cut here > ------------------------------ This in fact leaves the system in a state where X can't be run (at least as far as gnome is concerned) So my questions are: o) Has anybody else seen this before? o) What can I do against it? Thanks much in advance for your help, -ewald