From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 17 00:26:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F31A1065672 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from morganw@chemikals.org) Received: from warped.bluecherry.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:440:eeee:fffb::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F238FC16 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:26:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from volatile.chemikals.org (adsl-67-252-5.shv.bellsouth.net [98.67.252.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by warped.bluecherry.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC68F98F3802; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:26:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (morganw@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by volatile.chemikals.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1H0QiLr093980; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:26:45 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from morganw@chemikals.org) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:26:44 -0600 (CST) From: Wes Morgan X-X-Sender: morganw@volatile To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov In-Reply-To: <4B7B04F6.3010302@yandex.ru> Message-ID: References: <4B7B04F6.3010302@yandex.ru> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at warped X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any plans to sync udf with NetBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:26:53 -0000 On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Hello! > > Does anybody in FreeBSD community is working on syncing udf code with NetBSD > implementation? They now have v2.60 spec support, and FreeBSD can't yet read > v2.0 discs, burned in vista. > > I know about udfclient port, but it is always great to have it in native. I > can't code myself but i can help in testing ;) I second the motion. This is a necessary step for blu-ray support, as well. How close is the netbsd filesystem layer to ours?