From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 19 04:59:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C7416A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 04:59:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E4743D48 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 04:59:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-160-236-186.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.236.186]) by pi.codefab.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0J4xUxE078787 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:59:32 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <41EDE9AC.6070100@mac.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 00:01:32 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Michael C. Shultz" References: <200501181848.25599.reso3w83@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <200501181848.25599.reso3w83@verizon.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.5 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on pi.codefab.com cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmanager 0.2.3 ready but hosting site sourceforge.net is broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 04:59:34 -0000 Michael C. Shultz wrote: > Version 0.2.3 of portmanager is ready but sourceforge.net the hosting > site is not mirroring new releases for some reason. They are giving a > canned response to software developers that they may look at the problem > in 5 days or so, here is a link: Yeah, I'm running into that issue too. For now, I'm starting to locally mirror distfiles for all of the ports I maintain (at least that way, people asking where's the distfile for so-and-so, I can actually answer them). Anyway, if you need a place, I've got (some) bandwidth available... -- -Chuck