From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 19 18:52:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5643A16A4CE; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:52:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao08.cox.net (lakermmtao08.cox.net [68.230.240.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A3343D39; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:52:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from dolphin.local.net ([68.11.71.51]) by lakermmtao08.cox.net ESMTP <20040919185239.IPSE27491.lakermmtao08.cox.net@dolphin.local.net>; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 14:52:39 -0400 Received: from dolphin.local.net (localhost.local.net [127.0.0.1]) by dolphin.local.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id i8JIqcYw051751; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:52:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:52:33 -0500 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Message-ID: <20040919135233.4997ea78@dolphin.local.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; amd64-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: amd64@freebsd.org cc: re@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NO_MIXED_MODE X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:52:40 -0000 On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 04:17:55 +0200, des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) wrote: > I just got an ASUS SK8N motherboard that has the problematic nForce 3 > chipset. It runs 5.3 BETA4 fine, except you have to boot it in safe > mode because the APIC only works properly in mixed mode, and GENERIC > has the NO_MIXED_MODE option. Took me quite a while to figure that > out... >=20 > Should we consider removing that option for 5.3-RELEASE? I'll second that motion. I have the same chipset, and the same problem with NO_MIXED_MODE. I think we should err on the side of caution with this one. --=20 Conrad J. Sabatier -- "In Unix veritas"