From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Jul 26 01:18:10 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA20269
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 01:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns.cs.msu.su (root@redsun.cs.msu.su [158.250.10.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA20264
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 01:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from janus.msu.su (janus [158.250.17.20]) by ns.cs.msu.su (8.8.6/8.6.12) with SMTP id MAA14364 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 12:18:20 +0400 (DST)
Received: by janus.msu.su (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id MAA05176; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 12:18:17 +0400
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 12:18:17 +0400
Message-Id: <199707260818.MAA05176@janus.msu.su>
From: "Sergei S. Laskavy" <laskavy@cs.msu.su>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: /bin/chio: why in /bin ?
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Dear FreeBSD hackers!

I wonder why "mt", "tar" are in "/usr/bin" while chio is in "/bin".

Sergei S. Laskavy