Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:38:31 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Dennis <dennis@etinc.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: stray irq 7 Message-ID: <20010118223831.J1349@tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <200101182245.f0IMjYQ01614@mass.osd.bsdi.com>; from msmith@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 02:45:34PM -0800 References: <5.0.0.25.0.20010118165305.02eb76a0@mail.etinc.com> <200101182245.f0IMjYQ01614@mass.osd.bsdi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 02:45:34PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote: > > Ok, so why is this only a problem in FreeBSD 4.x, or better yet, since its > > a well known problem, why arent they handled more eloquently? > > I have no idea why it only happens to you with 4.x; the code that does > that has been in place since the 2.x days. There's no real way to be > more "eloquent" about it; you could just ignore them like everyone else > does, but that doesn't alert you to misbehaving hardware, which is > sometimes desirable. At the risk of being dragged into this, I've see this kind of behaviour on RELENG_3 also in the past. Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010118223831.J1349>