From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jun  7 21:22:06 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA03945
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 7 Jun 1996 21:22:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA03899;
          Fri, 7 Jun 1996 21:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10])
          by who.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with ESMTP id VAA02119
          ; Fri, 7 Jun 1996 21:21:54 -0700
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id WAA02553; Fri, 7 Jun 1996 22:19:19 -0600
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1996 22:19:19 -0600
From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199606080419.WAA02553@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: davidg@Root.COM
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Hackers),
        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Stable Users),
        FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org (FreeBSD current users)
Subject: Re: The -stable problem: my view 
In-Reply-To: <199606080406.VAA12386@Root.COM>
References: <199606071529.JAA29241@rocky.sri.MT.net>
	<199606080406.VAA12386@Root.COM>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> We need a new model. One that keeps the quality high and one
> that doesn't prevent me from doing new development.

Do you have any suggestions?  Would creating a new 'stable' tree today
be even remotely acceptable?


Nate