From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 17 06:45:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8CF16A4CE for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 06:45:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D6B43D48 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 06:45:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leafy7382@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 1so72438rny for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:45:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=ciAkZ2gzBStRaEZ3BjRCLFkdLmUamvbXr46IGnCaFSjp8A6/pqmXiRAWmYB8vmxIEV/xyNcN0OoyVX2akSvBt68oVWAMZQKVYsTfXSPuxzwzBfR6YUyKAfA0OCP/aCg7Vm0jt4KQNH6FYr9INogTyu8EKgiiazEHU0gaIJhGwxw= Received: by 10.38.206.58 with SMTP id d58mr340919rng; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:45:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.8.9 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:45:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:45:39 +0800 From: Jiawei Ye To: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu In-Reply-To: <4239248E.4030005@alumni.rice.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <669ac2d050316073078b2e909@mail.gmail.com> <20050316211259.0BEEC5D07@ptavv.es.net> <669ac2d05031617544216b6d2@mail.gmail.com> <4239248E.4030005@alumni.rice.edu> cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Jeff Smick Subject: Re: ATAPICAM Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jiawei Ye List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 06:45:47 -0000 On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 00:32:46 -0600, Jon Noack wrote: > The handbook is a bit confusing on this. It calls the config(8) kernel > build the "traditional way" and 'make buildkernel' the "new way". If I > am a new user and don't want to stray far from the norm, wouldn't I pick > the "traditional way"? Shouldn't we make it more clear the "new way" is > the "recommended and officially sanctioned way"? > > Jon My suggestion would be s/traditional/deprecated s/new/standard $.2 -- "Without the userland, the kernel is useless." --inspired by The Tao of Programming