From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Dec 31 21:27:24 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA08693 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 31 Dec 1995 21:27:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from cps201.cps.cmich.edu (cps201.cps.cmich.edu [141.209.20.201]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA08688 Sun, 31 Dec 1995 21:27:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from cps201 (cps201.cps.cmich.edu [141.209.20.201]) by cps201.cps.cmich.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id AAA16375; Mon, 1 Jan 1996 00:27:07 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Jan 1996 00:27:07 -0500 (EST) From: Mail Archive X-Sender: archive@cps201 To: "Marc G. Fournier" cc: "Jonathan M. Bresler" , Terry Lambert , joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, daemon@bee.cs.kiev.ua, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NFS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > I'd say that rpc.quotad would be more of a priority as far > as anyone that wants or is using FreeBSD in any ISP environment, > more so then rpc.lockd... Uhmmm not when your working with mail spools on FreeBSD and you have SunOS as a user account server. lockd is vital if nothing more than to get rid of the annoying messages. RPC.RQUOTAD can be taken from a couple other unicies if need be. (Linux/NetBSD) where RPC.LOCKD doesn't even exist anywhere. :) just my 2cents