From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jun 24 11:00:50 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA23531
          for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 24 Jun 1998 11:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA23338
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 24 Jun 1998 10:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from root@implode.root.com)
Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA00567;
	Wed, 24 Jun 1998 10:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199806241759.KAA00567@implode.root.com>
To: Cejka Rudolf <xcejka00@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz>
cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: fxp0: Hard bug??? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 17 Jun 1998 15:42:53 +0200."
             <199806171342.NAA21334@sts.dcse.fee.vutbr.cz> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 10:59:15 -0700
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>_BUT_ after adding two lines:
>
>        CSR_WRITE_4(sc, FXP_CSR_PORT, FXP_PORT_SOFTWARE_RESET);
>        DELAY(10);
>
>in fxp_init() function, kernel boots well!
>
>I think, there _must_ be hard bug in initialization of Intel
>EtherExpress 100B card in if_fxp.c. Am I right?

   fxp_init() calls fxp_stop() as the first thing it does. fxp_stop() does
the reset as above as the first thing that it does. I don't see why adding
the above lines of code to fxp_init() would make any difference since this
is already occuring. You might try changing the DELAY(10) in fxp_stop() to
something larger and see if that also fixes the problem.

-DG

David Greenman
Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message