From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 13:27:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509CD106564A for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 13:27:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51818FC0C for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 13:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbdr11 with SMTP id dr11so24174327wgb.31 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 05:27:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zWDMvdRW/BURMKEqPoZQ4y+Hc5ymD8PivRjuoPLgk8Q=; b=BZDTlC/oA/rO+oxWvocvLtOWhtTtGDarYbz2Kq1ojylRi4JpcOu3a89YktzbIF2Qor wUv0P0/HLIV2bOCQX6+6+tq4b6Cq/xGr/cUT4KgGXdR94cUkRP04w0qGDZUqYhoJENoN u/H7I0bLd79j+UDPZnVCGwTDU6eS2Fqa9em7g= Received: by 10.216.139.140 with SMTP id c12mr22045047wej.26.1325251655723; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 05:27:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g26sm13259032wbo.16.2011.12.30.05.27.34 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 30 Dec 2011 05:27:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 13:27:32 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111230132732.0654652b@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <1325229204.34713.YahooMailNeo@web140405.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <1325229204.34713.YahooMailNeo@web140405.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Why do I feel like compact flash is more reliable than SSD ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 13:27:37 -0000 On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 23:13:24 -0800 (PST) UFS User wrote: > Most of these were read-only mode, but some of them were left mounted > 'rw' for years (with no swapping, of course). =A0The bottom line is, > they never failed, and some were (and are) in the field for over 8 > years now. > So is this just chance, or ... are CF cards really a lot more > reliable than SSD ? Are you sure you haven't answered your own question here?=20 "Most ... were read-only" and you don't mention whether those that were mounted rw were getting the same amount of writes.