From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 16 02:43:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C73916A41C for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 02:43:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) Received: from crumpet.united-ware.com (ddsl-66-42-172-210.fuse.net [66.42.172.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6931E43D45 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 02:43:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (ddsl-66-42-172-210.fuse.net [66.42.172.210]) (authenticated bits=0) by crumpet.united-ware.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j6G2d3wj073253 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 15 Jul 2005 22:39:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) From: Anish Mistry To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 22:41:12 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <42D79676.6040606@samsco.org> <635F9EBB-6C5E-4437-ABDE-99D0540BC774@anduin.net> <200507152253.26648@harrymail> In-Reply-To: <200507152253.26648@harrymail> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1834340.okCFC6s2b6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200507152241.19263.mistry.7@osu.edu> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,MYFREEBSD2 autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on crumpet.united-ware.com Cc: Emanuel Strobl , Eirik =?iso-8859-1?q?=D8verby?= Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0-BETA1 Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 02:43:48 -0000 --nextPart1834340.okCFC6s2b6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 15 July 2005 04:53 pm, Emanuel Strobl wrote: > Am Freitag, 15. Juli 2005 22:12 CEST schrieb Eirik =D8verby: > > On Jul 15, 2005, at 5:10 PM, Emanuel Strobl wrote: > > > Am Freitag, 15. Juli 2005 16:58 CEST schrieb Marc G. Fournier: > > >> And, for "the stupid question of the day" ... how long before > > >> 5.x is no > > >> longer supported? I'm just about to deploy a new server, and > > >> was *going* to go with 5.x, but would I be better just > > >> skipping 5.x altogether? Or are there such drastic changes in > > >> 6.x that doing so at > > >> this time wouldn't be prudent? > > > > > > To post my opinion to the last part of the question: I'm also > > > deploying new > > > servers and I'll take RELENG_6 since there are so many > > > improovements (nullfs in jails etc.) and 6-current has been > > > pretty stable for me on my > > > > Hoi, > > what's changed wrt jails? And nullfs? I haven't been following > > the "news" as closely as I perhaps should, but I feel that the > > jail functionality doesn't get half as much attention in release > > notes as it should... Porting my jail-related tools to 5.x from > > 4.x was painful, but enjoyable when I was done. How does 6.x > > look? > > I'm not the developer guy so I can't tell you anything > authoritative but I know that there has been an awful perfomance > degradation when mounting nullfs-filesystems into a jail under > RELENG_5, espacially noticable with apache! I just know that Jeff > Roberson committed incredible lots of vm/vfs changes, perhaps this > also solved the md performance problem, at least the nullfs problem > was solved! > The nullfs performace issue has been fixed. =2D-=20 Anish Mistry --nextPart1834340.okCFC6s2b6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC2HPPxqA5ziudZT0RAvijAJ46ksuqXQK9XPNS91y53ZxlNgbsCQCgrpQE qIgvjF+OFSV2OOLj5Px+Pec= =Fa2o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1834340.okCFC6s2b6--