From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 30 07:28:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9524A16A403; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:28:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg) Received: from jengal.datamax.bg (jengal.datamax.bg [82.103.104.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B0A43D5F; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:28:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg) Received: from qlovarnika.bg.datamax (qlovarnika.bg.datamax [192.168.10.2]) by jengal.datamax.bg (Postfix) with SMTP id EAA26B833; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:28:04 +0200 (EET) Received: (nullmailer pid 37786 invoked by uid 1002); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:28:06 -0000 Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:28:06 +0200 From: Vasil Dimov To: Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu Message-ID: <20061030072806.GA37208@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> References: <20061027231646.5b07bd8f@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20061028002501.32f5b845@it.buh.tecnik93.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061028002501.32f5b845@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Cc: Andrew Pantyukhin , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Christopher Boumenot Subject: Re: port_history - track port commit message comments X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vd@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:28:07 -0000 --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 12:25:01AM +0300, Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote: > On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 01:04:05 +0400 > "Andrew Pantyukhin" wrote: [...] > > [Wow, man, dspam ports is sure a place to learn many > > things :-) Great job!] >=20 > Thanks. > I'm pretty sure I re-invented the wheel a few times there; but overall > I consider it to be one of the most user-friendly ports we have. >=20 > We could _optionally_ support that kind of UPDATING file in our > framework; and we also could support the check-options-version.=20 Automatically displaying some part of files/UPDATING to the user is great. It would just be little more easier to manage if it would display up to the next entry (e.g. stop when line ^## is found) rather than a predefined number of lines. Thus eliminating the need to support the _UPD_LINE_NO variable. --=20 Vasil Dimov gro.DSBeerF@dv % Testing can show the presense of bugs, but not their absence. -- Edsger W. Dijkstra --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFFRamGFw6SP/bBpCARArayAKDDgoSkmsLtSegk/D0pv8+cWXkfTwCg0AVP eGgfP0J61R035q/VRJmInGg= =rKIl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--