From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 14 17:25:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FDDB72008 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:25:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eric@vangyzen.net) Received: from smtp.vangyzen.net (hotblack.vangyzen.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:7400:216:3eff:fe72:314f]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F862001; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:25:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eric@vangyzen.net) Received: from sweettea.beer.town (unknown [76.164.8.130]) by smtp.vangyzen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3EFF564F9; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:25:18 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: [CFT] ypldap testing against OpenLDAP and Microsoft Active Directory To: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <7c39e5ac-3ed7-f19a-e175-d27af07eea47@delphij.net> From: Eric van Gyzen Message-ID: <003f57a2-4df3-3cb0-0e31-4dcbd8856802@vangyzen.net> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:25:15 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:25:19 -0000 On 06/ 9/16 05:49 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 09/06/2016 18:34, Craig Rodrigues wrote: >> There is still value to ypldap as it is now, and getting feedback from >> users (especially Active Directory) would be very useful. >> If someone could document a configuration which uses IPSEC or OpenSSH >> forwarding, that would be nice. >> >> In future, maybe someone in OpenBSD or FreeBSD will implement things like >> LDAP over SSL. > What advantages does ypldap offer over nss-pam-ldapd (in ports) ? > nss-pam-ldapd can use both ldap+STARTTLS or ldaps to encrypt data in > transit, and I find it works very well for using OpenLDAP as a central > account database. I believe it works with AD, but haven't tried that > myself. nss-pam-ldapd works very well with Active Directory. At work, dozens of people use it on their workstations and hundreds of people use it on the build servers. We've been doing this for years with no issues. Well, we've caused some issues for ourselves, of course... ;) Eric