From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 23 08:43:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B3516A4CE; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:43:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EEF643D54; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:43:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 06197530D; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:43:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 85471530C; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:42:45 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6848633C3E; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:42:45 +0100 (CET) To: obrien@FreeBSD.org References: <200502230110.j1N1ASPc000377@repoman.freebsd.org> <5d57b42a8a213bc79d51115a04f3fc1f@xcllnt.net> <20050223081903.GA7858@dragon.nuxi.com> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:42:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20050223081903.GA7858@dragon.nuxi.com> (David O'Brien's message of "Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:19:03 -0800") Message-ID: <867jkzmzui.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.1 cc: Tom Rhodes cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Marcel Moolenaar Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/examples/etc make.conf X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:43:52 -0000 "David O'Brien" writes: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 06:04:43PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > On Feb 22, 2005, at 5:10 PM, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > > Add 'nocona' to the list of Intel ia64 CPUs and k8 to the AMD CPUs. > > Nocona is not an ia64 processor. It's a xeon (=3Dia32) processor with > > EM64T. > It isn't "with EM64T". Or was the i386 an "80286 with registers" as > something special? A Nocona is a 64-bit Xeon. That still doesn't make it an Itanium... it should be listed under amd64, not ia64. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no