Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:29:57 +0200 From: "Muenz, Michael" <m.muenz@spam-fetish.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Support for Dual NIC Message-ID: <04125f40-6388-f074-d935-ce6c16d220fa@spam-fetish.org> In-Reply-To: <cd2d419c-5ddc-ee5c-e8b3-d791058624ab@spam-fetish.org> References: <CAM_1nP3--4Eunr=o9tN3dFmrL0gr0Cydr3AxXSNJPxmDaTZk8g@mail.gmail.com> <cd2d419c-5ddc-ee5c-e8b3-d791058624ab@spam-fetish.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 07.04.2018 um 22:52 schrieb Muenz, Michael: > Am 07.04.2018 um 20:15 schrieb Ralston Champagnie: >> Hello Guys, >> >> Netmap natively support only the four ports NIC doesn't make sense whe= n >> considering that dual NIC has the same exact chipset as the quad ones.= .. >> >> Is there a patch available? Noticed problems with pictures or videos=20 >> such >> as this with the dual (mine: Intel 82575) and IPS with lots of memory = - >> 196.115874 [1071] netmap_grab_packets=C2=A0=C2=A0 bad pkt at 445 1en 2= 164 >> >> >> Kind regards, Ralston > Hm, that might be the reason why my Intel X710 Dual SFP+ doesn't work=20 > when > running Suricata with IPS / netmap. > I replaced with an old X520 DA Dual SFP+ and it works. X520 is ix and=20 X710 ixl but no idea if it's diver related. Michael
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?04125f40-6388-f074-d935-ce6c16d220fa>