From owner-cvs-all Sat Jul 24 18:32: 5 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from rebel.net.au (rebel.rebel.net.au [203.20.69.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66301500E for ; Sat, 24 Jul 1999 18:32:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kkenn@rebel.net.au) Received: from 203.20.69.77 (dialup-7.rebel.net.au [203.20.69.77]) by rebel.net.au (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP id KAA13539 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 1999 10:59:03 +0930 Received: (qmail 20600 invoked from network); 25 Jul 1999 01:27:17 -0000 Received: from localhost (kkenn@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Jul 1999 01:27:17 -0000 Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 10:57:16 +0930 (CST) From: Kris Kennaway Reply-To: kkenn@rebel.net.au To: Tim Vanderhoek Cc: Nate Williams , Matt Jacob , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/msgs msgs.1 msgs.c In-Reply-To: <19990724175234.C13618@mad> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Sat, 24 Jul 1999, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > In general, I think the average FreeBSD committer has a better style > for writing commit messages than committers from other projects with > closed CVS repos or that are just learning what a source repo is. This is very true - people should subscribe to source-changes@openbsd.org if they want to see some very good examples of bad commit messages: "fix" "better" "oops" etc. Along with the lack of attribution for changes in many cases (i.e. which have in fact come from FreeBSD) it makes it hard to know which commits are potentially relevant for FreeBSD :-( Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message