From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 19:36:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9D616A4CE for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 19:36:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.mho.com (smtp.mho.net [64.58.4.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B170543FBF for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 19:36:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 71577 invoked by uid 1002); 1 Dec 2003 03:36:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) (64.58.1.252) by smtp.mho.net with SMTP; 1 Dec 2003 03:36:32 -0000 Message-ID: <3FCAB702.4040603@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:35:30 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031103 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@FreeBSD.org References: <200311292348.hATNmi50060667@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031201032205.GA41354@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20031201032205.GA41354@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/scripts print-cdrom-packages.sh X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 03:36:38 -0000 David O'Brien wrote: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:48:44PM -0800, Scott Long wrote: > >>scottl 2003/11/29 15:48:44 PST >> >> FreeBSD src repository >> >> Modified files: >> release/scripts print-cdrom-packages.sh >> Log: >> vim-lite can hardly be considered 'lite'. Remove it. > > > Why isn't it "lite"? > -rw-r--r-- 1 portmgr archive 2M Nov 18 01:09 vim-lite-6.2.139.tbz > > Lets look at the Emacs editors you left behind: > -rw-r--r-- 1 portmgr archive 11M Nov 21 17:21 emacs-21.3.tbz > > I predict you will become very unpopular for this commit. > Please remove Emacs instead. > I think that you failed to see that there was both 'vim' and 'vim-lite'. In the interest of saving space, one needed to go. I'm happy to discuss which of the two is more appropriate, but I'm adamant that I will remain silent on an emacs v. vi debate.