From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sat Dec 7 23:46:42 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C911D0644 for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2019 23:46:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcel@brickporch.com) Received: from mail.brickporch.com (mail.brickporch.com [52.33.181.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47VmM536lFz4Mkh for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2019 23:46:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcel@brickporch.com) Received: from twill.home.brickporch.com (69-84-2-229.mxu.aerioconnect.net [69.84.2.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.brickporch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44E1112CC9B for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2019 23:47:06 +0000 (UTC) From: Marcel Flores Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: ThunderX Networking Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2019 15:46:40 -0800 References: <340B43A0-8E12-4F8C-A7F0-844BF8A55DB8@brickporch.com> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <2DB40DB6-73D0-440A-94B3-82A173E9DF3E@brickporch.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47VmM536lFz4Mkh X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of marcel@brickporch.com designates 52.33.181.202 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=marcel@brickporch.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.05 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_SPACES(0.50)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[brickporch.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.85)[ipnet: 52.32.0.0/14(-2.89), asn: 16509(-1.30), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:52.32.0.0/14, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2019 23:46:42 -0000 > On Dec 7, 2019, at 3:41 PM, Marcel Flores = wrote: >=20 > Hi All, >=20 > Took another look at the this. It seems the issue arose in this = commit: >=20 > https://reviews.freebsd.org/rS334880 >=20 > Manually removing the additional check and building a kernel allowed = it to > match the PHY device. >=20 > Following the steps outlined here: >=20 > = https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2015-November/012612.html >=20 > and was able to get the onboard NIC working. >=20 >=20 > This feels very much like a bug in the check logic of rS334880 to me, = but > I admit I'm out of my depth on what exactly it's checking for. >=20 > -Marcel >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org=E2=80=9D Of course, I linked to the wrong commit, that should be: https://reviews.freebsd.org/rS336281 In particular rS336281 seems to have been a follow up to rS334880. -Marcel