Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 7 Dec 2019 15:46:40 -0800
From:      Marcel Flores <marcel@brickporch.com>
To:        freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ThunderX Networking 
Message-ID:  <2DB40DB6-73D0-440A-94B3-82A173E9DF3E@brickporch.com>
In-Reply-To: <FE344936-D6F2-4182-AEF6-D2D795333627@brickporch.com>
References:  <340B43A0-8E12-4F8C-A7F0-844BF8A55DB8@brickporch.com> <FE344936-D6F2-4182-AEF6-D2D795333627@brickporch.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> On Dec 7, 2019, at 3:41 PM, Marcel Flores <marcel@brickporch.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> Hi All,
>=20
> Took another look at the this. It seems the issue arose in this =
commit:
>=20
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/rS334880
>=20
> Manually removing the additional check and building a kernel allowed =
it to
> match the PHY device.
>=20
> Following the steps outlined here:
>=20
> =
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2015-November/012612.html
>=20
> and was able to get the onboard NIC working.
>=20
>=20
> This feels very much like a bug in the check logic of rS334880 to me, =
but
> I admit I'm out of my depth on what exactly it's checking for.
>=20
> -Marcel
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to =
"freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org=E2=80=9D

Of course, I linked to the wrong commit, that should be:

https://reviews.freebsd.org/rS336281

In particular rS336281 seems to have been a follow up to rS334880.

-Marcel




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2DB40DB6-73D0-440A-94B3-82A173E9DF3E>