From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 26 08:20:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F407106566B for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 08:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.59.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54538FC14 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 08:20:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta19.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.98]) by QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id A8Kg1e00127AodY5B8LBJN; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 08:20:11 +0000 Received: from koitsu.dyndns.org ([98.248.46.159]) by omta19.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id A8LA1e0063S48mS3f8LAxB; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 08:20:11 +0000 Received: by icarus.home.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EB64B9B425; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 01:20:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 01:20:08 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100426082008.GA42937@icarus.home.lan> References: <20100418213727.GA98129@icarus.home.lan> <20100418232420.GA4620@duncan.reilly.home> <4BCC9B5D.5020603@FreeBSD.org> <20100419185446.GA36397@icarus.home.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100419185446.GA36397@icarus.home.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: rc(8) script -- waiting for the network to become usable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 08:20:11 -0000 On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:54:46AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:05:17AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > On 4/18/2010 4:24 PM, Andrew Reilly wrote: > > > By way of discussion, I'd just like to re-iterate what I > > > said the first time around: it must be understood that this > > > sort of thing is a (necessary) hacky-workaround that should > > > ultimately be unnecessary. > > > > While I find the discussion about launchd-type facilities interesting, > > we have a real problem at the moment and now we have a real solution for it. > > > > Jeremy, since no one has criticized your idea on a technical basis why > > don't you run it by the -net and -rc lists to be sure that it's > > technically sound, then I would be inclined to move forward with it. > > Doug and Garrett -- thanks. I'll send a shorter mail to said lists > referencing the discussion here on -stable and let folks weigh in. > > Much appreciated! I've sent said mail to -rc and -net. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |