From owner-freebsd-multimedia Sun Aug 11 03:23:29 1996 Return-Path: owner-multimedia Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id DAA00728 for multimedia-outgoing; Sun, 11 Aug 1996 03:23:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA00715 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 1996 03:23:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA00548; Sun, 11 Aug 1996 03:23:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199608111023.DAA00548@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95 To: Christoph Kukulies cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SciText News In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 11 Aug 1996 12:11:17 +0200." <199608111011.MAA27636@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 11 Aug 1996 03:23:01 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >From The Desk Of "Christoph P. Kukulies" : > > >From The Desk Of "Christoph P. Kukulies" : > > > > > > > > > > > > chuckr@glue.umd.edu said: > > > > > OK, I just committed /usr/ports/editors/scitext. I mailed the > > > ^^^^^^^ > > > IMO wrong place. It's not an editor, it belongs to /usr/ports/print > > > like TeX, only that it's wysiwyg. > > > > Well, it doesn't really belong on print nor in editors however if I had > > to make a choice I would say that the more appropiate category would > > have to be editors --- thats just my opinion 8) > > Well, then let's have an new category, named 'wordpro' :-) > I just thought, since SciTeXt has 'TeX' with a certain intention, it has > a greater affinity to TeX than to an editor. > The "TeX" is probably a misnomer since SciTeXt does not use TeX. We could think about starting a wordpro directory however there are not a lot of people working on good quality word-processors my inclination for now is that editor is a good place and if in the future we get a few more word processors then we can re-visit this issue. Regards, Amancio