Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 27 Dec 1998 11:38:36 +1030
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        Sue Blake <sue@welearn.com.au>, Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Cc:        Mark Ovens <marko@uk.radan.com>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Regulated names (was: Crazy Laws)
Message-ID:  <19981227113836.D12346@freebie.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <19981227085040.45844@welearn.com.au>; from Sue Blake on Sun, Dec 27, 1998 at 08:50:40AM %2B1100
References:  <368378AB.969463E2@uk.radan.com> <4.1.19981225064918.05738f10@127.0.0.1> <19981226021926.65101@welearn.com.au> <4.1.19981225180656.05a34790@mail.lariat.org> <4.1.19981225190800.058aee00@mail.lariat.org> <36852104.F849F0E5@uk.radan.com> <4.1.19981226110528.05881580@mail.lariat.org> <19981227080030.58332@welearn.com.au> <4.1.19981226141941.058890f0@mail.lariat.org> <19981227085040.45844@welearn.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday, 27 December 1998 at  8:50:40 +1100, Sue Blake wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 1998 at 02:32:37PM -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
>> At 08:00 AM 12/27/98 +1100, Sue Blake wrote:
>>
>>> Close, Brett, but you still don't seem to get it.
>>
>> Yes, I do get it, in all its inglorious vulgarity.
>
> Oh, I see. You get it, but you're not rude enough to spell it out. In
> fact you'll risk being misinterpreted to avoid being seen as indelicate
> to your part of the world. But you are naughty enough to continue using
> a word that is potentially highly offensive to us (and Australians are
> *not* easily offended by words). Bloody typical :-)

To quote a letter published in ``The Australian'' (a newspaper founded
by a local Adelaide bloke made good) the other day, in connection with
the Clinton impeachment:

  The first Americans were puritans.  The first Australians were
  convicts.  We were lucky.
 
>> In America, the word "ass" is, in some contexts, used to refer
>> to that part of the anatomy, too. As in "piece of ~". (See an
>> unabridged American dictionary or, again, the OED.)
>
> Oh, I've always thought that phrase was a euphemism, referring to a
> nearby place to feebly hide the real target, rather than actually
> naming a different place.

Doubtless it originally was.  How do these words get their meaning?
Usually it's a transfer of meaning from a more harmless term.  Look at
the word ``bathroom'', which means ``toilet'' in America.  Of course,
``toilet'' itself was a euphemism (meaning, roughly, washroom).  I
once lived in a house where there was no toilet in the bathroom (it
was in a separate room).  Americans would ask for the bathroom, we'd
show them how to get there, and after a while they'd come back and say
``how do you flush that thing'', indicating the bidet.

Greg
--
See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers
finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981227113836.D12346>