From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 20 14:52:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E0D106566B; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8E78FC08; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:52:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [96.47.65.170]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94F0046B06; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:52:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF87EB99A; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:52:50 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:25:12 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p10; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <4F15D643.8000907@rewt.org.uk> <4F188683.3000504@rewt.org.uk> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201200925.12382.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:52:51 -0500 (EST) Cc: Adrian Chadd , Joe Holden Subject: Re: Timekeeping in stable/9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:52:52 -0000 On Friday, January 20, 2012 2:29:21 am Adrian Chadd wrote: > .. if you have a _reproducable_ case for this, mav@ needs to see it ASAP. > > The trouble is that mav@ isn't handed reproducable cases and thus can't > debug it. > > If you can supply some kind of box that provides this as a reproducable > issue, we can get it fixed ASAP. Otherwise it's a case of "can't reproduce > in our environments, sorry." However, if we haven't mentioned eventtimers at all in the release notes, that is a bit of a fail on our parts. That is a substantial change which needs to be adequately documented. -- John Baldwin