From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Aug 8 19:50:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DC937BAAE for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2000 19:50:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id TAA26807; Tue, 8 Aug 2000 19:50:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 19:50:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200008090250.TAA26807@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Laurence Berland Subject: Re: bin/2036: cpio size wraparound Reply-To: Laurence Berland Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/2036; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Laurence Berland To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, asami@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: bin/2036: cpio size wraparound Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 22:46:15 -0400 Or more likely, since all this pr is so old, it came before we got GNU cpio? I'm just speculating now, as I don't have the >2GB of free space needed to figure this out right now. -- Laurence Berland <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Windows 98: n. useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. http://stuy.debate.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message